6 fall 2009 paul lichterman religion 468 office hours: university of southern california mondays 10:00-11:30, or by appointment

6
Fall 2009 Paul Lichterman
Religion 468 Office hours:
University of Southern California Mondays 10:00-11:30, or
by appointment
KAP 356, [email protected]
Sociology of Religion
Here’s an OLD SYLLABUS: SPRING 2012 WILL BE SOMEWHAT SIMILAR BUT WITH
SOME DIFFERENT READINGS. UPDATED SYLLABUS WILL BE POSTED LATER.
Course Description
Are religious differences tearing Americans apart over issues such as
abortion and gay marriage? Can religious groups offer better social
welfare services than government agencies? Hasn’t religious belief
been dying in the U.S.? Why even talk about "religion" when everyone
has her or his own spirituality anyway? These are just a few of the
questions we ask as sociologists of religion. This course introduces
you to sociological concepts and findings that you can use to study
religion's social effects, and also to understand better what you read
everyday in the newspaper about religion in society.
This is a course in how to think about what religion does in society,
and what people do with religion. It is not an introduction to all the
religions practiced in the U.S. The bulk of our studies will treat a
variety of Christian and Jewish practices in the United States since
the 1960s. The course assumes that you are interested in learning
sociological concepts that we can apply to religion. The course does
not presume any particular religious faith on your part.
Our specific goals in this course are to:
•learn different sociological concepts for understanding religion in a
modern society
•learn about enormous transformations in the U.S. religious landscape
in the past forty years
•learn about different forms of public religious expression in the
post-1960s U.S.
Prerequisites: A sociology course is recommended before taking this
course, but not required. If you are taking this course without any
sociology background, you will need to take the initiative to learn
unfamiliar concepts, and ask questions whenever necessary.
Expectations: A discussion-intensive course with small research
projects is familiar to some students, but not to others. We will not
have midterms or a final. We will have take-home essays and two,
small, independent research projects. We will have a lot of
discussion. Participation in class discussions is crucial.
Participation means more than active listening—it means talking,
asking questions, pursuing ideas out loud, being willing to agree or
disagree with classmates out loud. Good attendance is crucial.
By enrolling in the course, you are agreeing to read assigned
materials thoughtfully, in time for class discussion. You are agreeing
to take yourself and others seriously in class discussions. If I
cannot tell whether or not students have done the reading
conscientiously, I may ask you to answer questions in writing, in
class, and grade these on-the-spot quizzes.
Our readings include selections from these books, available from the
bookstore:
Wade Clark Roof. 1999. Spiritual Marketplace. Princeton: Princeton
Univ. Press.
Lynn Davidman. 1991. Tradition in a Rootless World. Berkeley:
University of California
Press.
Christian Smith. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving.
Chicago:
Univ. of Chicago Press.
Robert Wuthnow. 2005. America and the Challenges of Religious
Diversity. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Paul Lichterman. 2005. Elusive Togetherness. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Some of our readings are photocopied articles and chapters; these will
be available in a course reader.
Course Requirements
Undergraduates:
Participation in class, and any quizzes =15%
Two essay assignments (see schedule),
#1 worth 20% + #2 worth 25% = 45%
Two projects (see schedule), each worth 20% = 40%
Participation and presentations may sway your grade up or down,
especially if the grade is near a borderline.
One of our main goals for class time is to have engaging discussions
that welcome different contributions from people with different levels
of experience with social science. It’s a tricky art. We need to bring
to it our good will and openness to learning from everyone.
Description of requirements
ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION: Regular attendance and participation are
required. We sometimes will discuss concepts that are not available in
readings. Some of the required materials for this course—newspaper
articles, research documents, for instance—are available only in
class. Some of the learning in this course will emerge through
discussion rather than through lecture alone. I will take attendance
on occasion. Please be polite, turn off and don’t use cell phones or
other communication devices during our course. We’re here to talk and
listen; you’ll like it a lot more without interruptions.
BRIEF PRESENTATIONS: We will have “kick-starts” roughly once a week.
The point of these is to offer comments (3-5 minutes, no more) on one
or two things you found interesting, difficult, or troubling about the
reading, things that can kick-start discussions that will move toward
broader points. The goal is to start with your interests, concerns and
confusions, instead of just mine. Please do not make these into
summaries of the readings. Your kick-start comments and our ensuing
discussion will give me a good idea of which parts of the readings, if
any, may have been unclear or confusing, and then I will intercede if
necessary to make sure we all share a basic grasp of the reading
before continuing our discussion. Your comments might:
-apply the reading to some current social issue
-draw out an idea or concept that you found particularly interesting,
or particularly hard to understand
-offer criticisms (with good will) of the reading from some
intellectual or moral standpoint of your own
ESSAYS: There will be two take-home essay assignments during the
semester. Each assignment will ask you to write two essays of roughly
4-5 pages (or one essay of roughly 9-10 pages) in response to
questions given out in class. Essays will need to analyze readings in
the context of lecture and class discussion.
•Essay due dates are on the schedule below.
•Late essays are counted down a grade for every class day they are
late.
•If your essay is not handed in at the start of class on the day it is
due, it counts as late.
Lateness: You have one chance to turn in an essay assignment late
without penalty. This will be the only chance to turn in an essay late
without penalty, and no more than two class days beyond its due date.
This is intended to help you manage your schedule with other classes.
Please don’t ask for other extensions due to ordinary illness, broken
printers, or scheduling snafus. There will not be extensions other
than the one extension that each student gets once for an essay,
unless you have an extraordinary circumstance that can be verified by
third parties who are in an official position to tell. It is very
unlikely you will have such a circumstance.
PROJECTS: Everyone will do two projects. Each consists of writing a
paper (roughly 7-8 pages), based on brief research experiences. An
assigned book will be your guide to each research project. The class
offers three project options; you need to choose TWO of the three
during the semester. The research will involve carefully observing,
participant-observing, or interviewing people in religious
congregations or religiously based volunteer or activist groups, or
people who follow religious or spiritual practices. Handouts in class
will describe each project further and we will discuss these so that
everyone knows what to do.
Both projects need to be handed in on time. You will be glad that the
class kept you to a schedule; projects are harder to complete without
one.
SCHEDULE
Readings are from required books unless marked by R for course reader.
Readings under each set of dates are the readings to have completed
for those dates. When necessary, I’ll clarify which readings to do for
which days.
August 24: Why study religion sociologically?
PART I: Large, long-term trends in U.S. religions, 1960-present
This part of the course introduces you to important findings and
debates about religious change in American society.
Aug. 26, Aug. 31: Introduction to the modernist view of religion:
secularization theory
and its social context
R Berger, Peter. 1963. short selection on institutions, from
Invitation to Sociology
Garden City: Doubleday and Co., 1963,
R Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1969. The Sacred Canopy (Garden
City: Doubleday and Co., 1969, pp. 127-153, (Chap. 6) “Secularization
and the Problem of Plausibility.”
Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity,
pp. 1-36.
September 2: Did religion go silent? Why would anyone think that?
The argument about private religion
R Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of
Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan. Pp. 107-114 only.
R Besecke, Kelly. 2005. “Seeing Invisible Religion: Religion as a
Societal Conversation about Transcendent Meaning. Sociological Theory
23(2): 179-196.
No class September 7
Sept. 9, 14: The move from “religion” to “spirituality” across U.S.
religions
W.C. Roof, Spiritual Marketplace, pp. 3-110, 315-323.
Sept. 16, 21, 23: Growth of religious individualism, or, what’s wrong
with Sheilaism?
R Robert Bellah et al.. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: U of
California Press,
Chapter 9 (pp. 219-249).
W.C. Roof, Spiritual Marketplace, pp. 145-179, 243-253, 305-314.
R George M. Thomas and Douglas Jardine. 1994. “Jesus and Self in
Everyday Life: Individual Spirituality through a Small Group in a
Large
Church.” Pp. 275-299 in R. Wuthnow, ed., “I Come Away Stronger”: How
Small Groups Are Shaping American Religion. Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans.
Project 1: Interview project on spirituality due Oct. 5, start of
class
No class September 28
Sept. 30, October 5, 7: How can tradition thrive in modern society?:
The case of orthodox Jewish American women
Orthodox Jewish women and the problem of tradition in a modern society
Lynn Davidman, Tradition in a Rootless World, pp. 26-73.
Comparing two kinds of orthodoxy
Lynn Davidman, Tradition in a Rootless World, pp. 74-107, 136-173,
191-206
Oct. 12, 14: Are culture wars ripping the U.S. apart? The story about
red and blue
R Hunter, James. 1991. Culture Wars. New York: Basic Books, pp. 31-64
(Chapter 1) only.
R Paul DiMaggio. 2003. “The Myth of Culture War.” Pp. 79-97 in J.
Rieder, ed.,
A Fractious Nation? Berkeley: University of California Press.
FIRST ESSAY ASSIGNMENT DUE OCT. 16, at 352 Kaprielian, 4:00pm.
Oct. 19, 21, 26: The growth of conservative Protestantism in the
modern U.S.
Introduction to evangelicalism in the U.S.
Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, pp. 1-19 SKIM, pp. 20-66
A sociological explanation for evangelicalism’s strength
--------------------------------------------------------
Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, pp. 89-119, 120-153
Ironies in evangelicalism: strength and ineffectiveness
Christian Smith, American Evangelicalism, pp.178-220
Christ-centeredness and religious diversity
Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity,
pp. 159-187.
Project 2: Observation project on evangelical church congregation due
Nov. 2,
start of class
Oct. 28, November 2: Taking stock of modernist assumptions: two views
R Chaves, Mark. 1994. "Secularization as Declining Religious
Authority."
Social Forces 72:749-775.
R Ammerman, Nancy. “Introduction: Observing Modern Religious Lives,”
in Everyday Religion. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 3-18.
PART II: Beyond modernist approaches: new and newly recognized
realities of religion in the U.S.
This part of our course treats aspects of American religion that have
been neglected in modernist theories.
Nov. 4, 9 11: Americans negotiating religious diversity
Introduction to religious diversity in the U.S. and debates about it
R. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, pp.
37-105
What are different ways Americans deal with religious diversity?
R. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, pp.
188-228 and
pp. 286-314
Nov. 16, 18, 23: Religion in public: mainline and evangelical
Protestant volunteers in
community service projects
Religion and the debate about civic engagement: Is civic America
dying?
Paul Lichterman, Elusive Togetherness, pp. 1-41
Religious volunteer groups trying to reach out: two styles
Paul Lichterman, Elusive Togetherness, pp. 60-98, 133-170
The quiet ways that religion matters
Paul Lichterman, Elusive Togetherness, pp. 171-246
Project 3: Participant-observation project on public religion due Nov.
30,
start of class.
Nov. 25, 30: Religion in social welfare: What do “faith-based” social
services do?
R Mark Chaves. 2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, pp. 44-93 only.
R Robert Wuthnow. 2004. Saving America? Faith-Based Services
and the Future of Civil Society. Princeton: Princeton U Press,
Pp. 138-175.
December 2: Course wrap-up: What new questions should we ask?
SECOND ESSAY ASSIGNMENT DUE ON FINAL EXAM DAY, by the end of the exam
period, at 352 Kaprielian.

  • 10 M A T E M Á T I
  • ENGINEERS AND GEOSCIENTISTS BRITISH COLUMBIA 2019 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING SYLLABUS
  • AAPD MAILING LIST RENTAL PRICING INFORMATION (EFFECTIVE
  • CECHEGARAY 13 29015MÁLAGA TELF +34 952 224 109
  • TROUSSEAU ETE SUR LA ROUTE DES PLAGES SEJOUR
  • ESTIMADOS INTEGRANTES DE LA COMISIÓN AD HOC SE REENVÍA
  • REVISED 72919 TENANT IMPROVEMENT HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL
  • PREGLED PLANA 514 1 PODACI O NARUČIOCU NAZIV NARUČIOCA
  • Doğal Si̇t Alanlari ve Taşinmaz Tabi̇at Varliklarinin Bulunduğu Alanlarin
  • PATVIRTINTA VENTOS REGIONINIO PARKO DIREKCIJOS DIREKTORIAUS 2020 M BIRŽELIO
  • RESIDE ACTUALMENTE EN ANDÚJAR MÓVIL 626165197 FECHA DE NACIMIENTO
  • COMUNIDAD ANDINA SECRETARIA GENERAL RESOLUCIÓN 111 6 DE AGOSTO
  • 121811 §1218—SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AT VA FACILITIES 121811
  • 19 IS PEACE JOURNALISM POSSIBLE? THREE FRAMEWORKS FOR ASSESSING
  • A3 SAM ATMCNS MULTINE39 CARTA DE ACUERDO
  • U BND TỈNH LÀO CAI SỞ NỘI VỤ SỐ
  • S OLICITUD DE PUBLICACIÓN EN EL BOLETÍN OFICIAL DE
  • SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL COMPUTER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING MS FINAL
  • ĆWICZENIA EKONOMIKA I ORGANIZACJA PRODUKCJI ZWIERZĘCEJ ZAGADNIENIA DO STUDIOWANIA
  • 51 APOLINAR BERLANGA CASAS Y EULALIA BERLANGA CASAS (1887)
  • NEWEST RESPONSES ARE FOUND FIRST REMARKS FROM THE HEAD
  • VÝLUKY NA OBDOBÍ 14072014 20072014 170 (PRAHA)
  • EL SUTRA DEL CORAZÓN (OM HOMENAJE A LA NOBLE
  • BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ   FAKÜLTESİYÜKSEKOKULUENSTİTÜSÜARAŞTIMA MERKEZİ   BÖLÜMÜPROGRAMIANABİLİM
  • M ULTIPLE SCLEROSIS RESEARCH AUSTRALIA PROGRESS REPORT COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS
  • SETUP THE LOG SERVER FROM OPER HOME DIRECTORY SVN
  • BASIC DEFINITION OF HUB AND SPOKE PLACEMENTS IN RELATION
  • PUBLIC HEALTH WALES PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PREVENTION OF RESPIRATORY
  • AGENZIA REFERENTI ISPRA ADOLFO PIROZZI (COORDINATORE
  • uw Recht op Inzage Correctie Aanvulling en Verwijdering Onderstaande